Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '22 at 06:43
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 165 2-Core 310 103% 189 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 392 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Lighting 183 Reflection 292 Parallax 189 149% 222 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 187 Splatting 129 122% 152 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 86 89 90 91 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 450 Write 421 Mixed 375 SusWrite 122 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 51.3 171% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 202 151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 627GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 427 434 433 437 432 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 420 Mixed 423 SusWrite 427 97% 428 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 89 4K Mixed 49.3 167% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 201 151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 832GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 187 187 187 187 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 160 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 181 96% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB 101,975 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 69.1 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 46.4 136% 47.4 GB/s	SC Read 30.9 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 40 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	382x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	205x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	157x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	124x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,208

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16