Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706QM_FA706QM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706QM_FA706QM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706QM
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211210
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 03:37
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 45.6
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 156
54% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 696
60% 514 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1151 818 850 839 789 756 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,387
Write 2,299
Mixed 1,663
SusWrite 867
404% 1,804 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 71.4
229% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 599
DQ Mixed 737
544% 720 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 252%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 24.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 30.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706QM_FA706QM Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706QM_FA706QM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback