HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 22 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8704
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '22 at 03:07
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 10400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$130 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 92.2 1-Core 124 2-Core 232 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 768 74% 612 Pts	64-Core 986 61% 986 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% HP(103C 8702) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.4% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 108 Parallax 124 101% 119 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 112 Splatting 104 96% 120 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB 8,409 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 527 332 262 269 253 256 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 880 Write 882 Mixed 910 SusWrite 316 168% 747 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 60.3 200% 71.6 MB/s	DQ Read 989 DQ Write 730 DQ Mixed 841 634% 854 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 219%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 699GB free Firmware: AX102V SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 110 111 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 86.6 Write 95.8 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 110 61% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8X 2x8GB 1,751 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 23.3 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 24.2 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	402x
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	92x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	311x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	171x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	47x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	146x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 140%, 9,143 samples	133x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 167%, 8,409 samples	100x

RAM
HP32D4U8S8HC-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 1,751 samples	183x
HP32D4U8S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 996 samples	143x
HP32D4U8S8ME-8X 1x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 411 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $363

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16