Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	97%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 63.1 2-Core 120 54% 87 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 249 36% 261 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	49% Average	Lighting 60 Reflection 60 Parallax 60 49% 60 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 60 Splatting 60 49% 60 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 654GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 76 73 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 419 Write 426 Mixed 403 SusWrite 75.6 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 39.8 140% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 79.7 82% 137 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 128%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 85GB free Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 213 162 214 218 210 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 321 Mixed 367 SusWrite 211 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 95.2 4K Mixed 34.8 150% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 218 192% 291 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 111%
Seagate ST3300622AS 300GB-$130 728 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 230GB free Firmware: 3.AAH SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 46 45 46 46 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 53.2 Write 43 Mixed 43.1 SusWrite 45.7 34% 46.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 37%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 190 191 188 195 204 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 110 Write 146 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 195 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 106%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 214GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 32.6 Write 20.6 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 20.7 30% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 4 263% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM3B8G2C1600L9L 2x8GB 512 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.6 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	564x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	387x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	236x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	266x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	208x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	169x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	98x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	100x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	56x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16