Acidanthera iMac19,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcidanthera iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 08:14
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
98% 176 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 976
93% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,517
94% 1,517 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 253
Parallax 516
199% 338 fps
MRender 395
Gravity 212
Splatting 333
257% 313 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 195%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 675 677 681 686 686 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 636
Write 558
Mixed 516
SusWrite 679
135% 597 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 61.8
210% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 767
574% 764 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 166%
Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
233GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 857 857 874 860 858 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,230
Write 2,017
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 897
364% 1,630 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 69.1
232% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 435
DQ Mixed 391
366% 581 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 246%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
235GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1263 1274 1283 1293 1304 1305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,079
Write 973
Mixed 980
SusWrite 1287
244% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 74.4
241% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 648
DQ Mixed 783
585% 784 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 232%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
523GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 473 475 477 480 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 437
Mixed 434
SusWrite 476
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 53.9
178% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 61.6
128% 260 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
147GB free
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 610 602 604 606 607 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 591
Write 587
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 606
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 9.7
75% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 14.7
108% 274 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF4000C19D4/8GX KF4000C 16GB
4000, 4000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 27.9
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 32
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Acidanthera iMac19,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $622
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback