Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 04:53
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 82.2
44% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 98.2
8-Core 93.3
13% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 88
5% 88 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 293
Mixed 307
79% 356 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 34.8
120% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 24.4
DQ Mixed 120
80% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4U0830160B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 17.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $393
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback