| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Gigabyte H110M-S2H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161108 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 24 '22 at 18:27 |
| Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78%
Very good
|
76% 132 Pts
|
53% 397 Pts
|
25% 402 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.8%
Average
|
49% 59.7 fps
|
49% 60.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 67 49 76 94 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
83% 113 MB/s
|
128% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 2621 1TB
644GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 40 41 41 40 MB/s
|
27.2%
Poor
|
48% 35.5 MB/s
|
156% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
68.6%
Good
|
69% 24.2 GB/s
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
58% 69.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,302 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 589x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 459x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 459x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 557x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 394x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 240x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $425 |