Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 days ago, 2 days ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 07:18
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$660
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 270
94% 166 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 872
88% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,464
98% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 108
Reflection 146
Parallax 97.3
87% 117 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 130
Splatting 106
111% 139 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$111
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 1309 1295 1447 1396 1311 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,493
Write 2,006
Mixed 1,480
SusWrite 1,371
411% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 84.7
282% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 1,149
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 925
691% 929 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 313%
Great: 410%
WD WD10EZEX-08RKKA0 2TB
193GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 101 103 105 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 107
Write 84
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 102
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 109%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$64
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 138
Write 119
Mixed 85
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
271GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 108 105 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 154
Write 116
Mixed 82
SusWrite 107
148% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
165% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 44: 4R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 35% 46 264 192 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 3,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,836
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $280Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $111
Intel Core i7-12700K $380Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback