PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus H110M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151116 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 23 '22 at 21:58 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
68.8%
Good
|
69% 118 Pts
|
48% 353 Pts
|
25% 368 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58%
Above average
|
60% 77.2 fps
|
56% 70.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
178GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 306 313 322 321 322 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
85% 378 MB/s
|
182% 64.2 MB/s
|
241% 324 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 28 21 15 15 40 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
41% 55.5 MB/s
|
121% 0.77 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.9%
Very good
|
73% 25.7 GB/s
|
64% 22.2 GB/s
|
47% 85.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
51% | 29% | 58 | 287 | 204 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | AOC2701 27E1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $180Bench 71%, 227,742 samples | 606x |
Core i7-6700Intel $291Bench 75%, 258,369 samples | 297x |
Core i5-6400Intel $182Bench 68%, 180,044 samples | 251x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 34%, 370,099 samples | 218x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,449,936 samples | 181x |
GTX 970Nvidia $125Bench 50%, 823,201 samples | 170x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $846 |