Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 18:48
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 167
2-Core 333
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 825
83% 672 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 152
Parallax 153
138% 158 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 129
Splatting 111
111% 140 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 135 171 116 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 216
Write 94.6
SusWrite 89.7
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 17.8
60% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 163
135% 195 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
233GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1125 534 408 408 407 408 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,479
Write 1,424
Mixed 1,209
SusWrite 548
261% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 28.5
93% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 720
534% 709 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 153%
Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
328GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 1383 1053 1031 1033 1030 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,433
Write 1,356
Mixed 1,196
SusWrite 1,152
289% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 27.3
90% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 710
533% 715 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 187%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
240GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 93 93 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 161
Write 144
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 96.9
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
226GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 138 136 146 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 102
Write 48.2
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 136
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 40.3
94% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback