Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage Formula (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '22 at 20:44
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 522 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 70 2-Core 139 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 277 37% 277 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 8385) 1.5GB CLim: 782 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	23% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 47.9 Parallax 31.2 22% 35.2 fps	MRender 43.2 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 29.8 26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57 3,190 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM01.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 189 184 138 148 152 MB/s Performing below potential (90^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71.5% Very good	Read 263 Write 224 Mixed 220 SusWrite 168 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 35.8 139% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 153 124% 174 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 89%
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB 3,778 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 14GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 40.1 Write 39.4 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 39.6 28% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 33%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 221GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 21 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 28.6 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 25 35% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	36x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $115Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	94x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	20x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16