| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M2N (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080327 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '22 at 18:33 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
43.2%
Average
|
44% 67.9 Pts
|
12% 85.8 Pts
|
5% 86.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 3800
Sapphire(174B E620) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
|
6.05%
Terrible
|
6% 6.93 fps
|
6% 6.93 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 89 84 85 87 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
57% 78.1 MB/s
|
187% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 160 169 165 172 MB/s
|
98%
Outstanding
|
99% 137 MB/s
|
124% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
15% 5.27 GB/s
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
41% 96.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M2N Builds (Compare 28 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M2N
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples | 8x |
| Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples | 5x |
| Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |