Medion MD34134/C682

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Medion MD34134/C682 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190304
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 190 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 280 32% 251 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Sapphire(174B 6438) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Lighting 74.5 Reflection 80.5 Parallax 76 61% 77 fps	MRender 86.8 Gravity 79.2 Splatting 74.6 65% 80.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB 2,750 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 75 175 187 185 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 344 Write 158 Mixed 150 SusWrite 140 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 8.9 59% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 89.5 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 15.1 35% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 89%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 15GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 85 93 101 99 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 299 Write 114 Mixed 167 SusWrite 94.1 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 18.7 72% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 94.5 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 103 80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 399GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 154 155 157 160 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 116 Write 146 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 152 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 18.6 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34134/C682 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: Medion MD34134/C682

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBForeseeBench 59%, 2,750 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	7x
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	4x
CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD 859B CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 32GBUnknownBench 75%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16