PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180412 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 20 '22 at 17:55 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 122 19 54 62 67 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
215GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 122 129 144 134 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 680x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 540x |
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples | 101x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 206x |
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 105x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $107 |