| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130918 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '22 at 15:36 |
| Run Duration | 215 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.2%
Good
|
68% 111 Pts
|
30% 221 Pts
|
14% 222 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8484) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
25% 33.6 fps
|
29% 36.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 102 20 41 45 45 MB/s
|
30.9%
Below average
|
31% 138 MB/s
|
56% 17.5 MB/s
|
11% 15.6 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
466GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 123 122 122 122 MB/s
|
69.6%
Good
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
49.7%
Average
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
62% 64.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,010 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 109x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 83x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $211 |