MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results


Gaming 197% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 221% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C84
Motherboard	MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220523
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '22 at 05:07
Run Duration	365 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 292 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 577 8-Core 1,121 101% 849 Pts	64-Core 2,200 136% 2,200 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 4037) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	200% Outstanding	Lighting 304 Reflection 263 Parallax 334 247% 300 fps	MRender 255 Gravity 244 Splatting 177 180% 226 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 614900WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4053 Write 4,708 Mixed 3,275 897% 4,012 MB/s	4K Read 82.4 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 110 394% 145 MB/s	DQ Read 1,750 DQ Write 1,350 DQ Mixed 1481 1,126% 1,527 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 168GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2200 2192 2194 2204 2204 2210 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	386% Outstanding	Read 2,577 Write 2,202 Mixed 1,485 SusWrite 2,201 475% 2116 MB/s	4K Read 61.2 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 84.9 295% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1461 DQ Write 1,135 DQ Mixed 1,262 954% 1286 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 386% Great: 393%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 594 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 625GB free Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1311 1463 1433 1505 1514 1496 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 1,503 Write 1,276 Mixed 990 SusWrite 1,453 294% 1,306 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 68.8 239% 89.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,004 DQ Write 734 DQ Mixed 648 544% 795 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 259%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB 1,705 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 293GB free Firmware: SN03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 232 226 229 231 234 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 231 Write 196 Mixed 119 SusWrite 229 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 1.4 16% 6.37 MB/s	DQ Read 4.2 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 1.6 3% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 45%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 550GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 430 324 52 51 242 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 494 Write 424 Mixed 402 SusWrite 256 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 25.7 126% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 36.2 72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 979GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 115 118 120 119 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 239GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 78 77 76 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 70.5 Write 73.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 76.9 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 95 100 109 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 71.7 Write 77.2 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 99.8 57% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.6 211% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB 2,539 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	MC Read 52.3 MC Write 47.6 MC Mixed 49.1 142% 49.7 GB/s	SC Read 29.7 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 44 96% 33.7 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 146%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,729x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,602x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,386x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,079x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	746x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	519x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	618x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	516x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	264x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	344x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	179x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,153

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16