Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 46.8 1-Core 42.8 2-Core 85.1 35% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 82.4 8-Core 83.5 11% 82.9 Pts	64-Core 84.1 5% 84.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 146E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.53% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 2.2 1% 2.47 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 3 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.53% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 210 288 333 293 289 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 384 Write 390 Mixed 366 SusWrite 285 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 40.5 116% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 129 98% 133 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 6 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	2x

SSD
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16