| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | EVGA Classified SR-2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101028 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 10 '22 at 20:56 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
75.4%
Very good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
50% 408 Pts
|
72% 1,159 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
|
35.6%
Below average
|
38% 45 fps
|
32% 38.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 220 219 218 218 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
58% 261 MB/s
|
98% 31.1 MB/s
|
148% 201 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170GB0-CH9 3x4GB
3 of 18 slots used
12GB DIMM 1333 MHz
|
40.4%
Average
|
40% 14.2 GB/s
|
22% 7.63 GB/s
|
65% 61.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 14x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 Fury-XAMD $781Bench 59%, 8,241 samples | 6x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $922 |