Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	14.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '22 at 14:27
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$150 99,450 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 212 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 630 64% 504 Pts	64-Core 514 34% 514 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280 307,299 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 8D90) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.6% Good	Lighting 83.6 Reflection 106 Parallax 71.2 68% 87 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 88.7 Splatting 74.5 72% 85.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7512G 512GB 5,606 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 19 19 6.4 13 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.1% Very poor	Read 93.3 Write 26.8 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 14.1 11% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 0 33% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 0 DQ Write 32.1 DQ Mixed 14.8 12% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$67 168,562 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 154 155 154 154 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 77.7 Write 140 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 152 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB 4,814 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 24.9 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 20.2 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	75	27"	1280 720	HKC277F 27N2Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 8,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $144Bench 81%, 961,699 samples	2,975x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $156Bench 76%, 790,751 samples	886x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $286Bench 82%, 538,296 samples	769x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $220Bench 71%, 379,688 samples	631x
RX 580AMD $213Bench 55%, 843,727 samples	579x
RTX 2060Nvidia $250Bench 88%, 596,203 samples	560x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 202%, 91,160 samples	257x
A400 240GBKingston $22Bench 66%, 422,525 samples	249x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $59Bench 287%, 375,956 samples	249x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 230,743 samples	564x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 87%, 32,237 samples	464x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 86%, 616,718 samples	338x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $270	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446	Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3050 $292	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378	Nvidia RTX 3070 $535	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $62	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17