| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Apple Mac-F42C88C8 |
| Memory | 15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080229 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 10 '22 at 13:57 |
| Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
46.2%
Average
|
40% 64.8 Pts
|
31% 261 Pts
|
22% 356 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.6%
Below average
|
28% 38.5 fps
|
36% 44.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS543225L9SA00 250GB-$41
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEOC43C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 33 30 33 34 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
29% 40 MB/s
|
119% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21%
Poor
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
13% 4.67 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Apple MacPro3,1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples | 98x |
| Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 19x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 22x |
| Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples | 11x |
| GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $388 |