Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '22 at 18:52
Run Duration	366 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 89.5 1-Core 147 2-Core 281 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 944 90% 741 Pts	64-Core 1,386 86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 117 Parallax 132 104% 125 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 124 Splatting 107 109% 138 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 359% 789GB free Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3857 3933 3938 3928 3926 3919 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	443% Outstanding	Read 1,984 Write 3,554 Mixed 2,285 SusWrite 3,917 669% 2,935 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 81.3 273% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,035 DQ Write 764 DQ Mixed 900 673% 900 MB/s
Poor: 207% ↑ This bench: 443% Great: 500%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1TB free Firmware: M6CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 361 345 297 282 312 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 496 Write 330 Mixed 139 SusWrite 326 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 19.5 105% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 21.2 52% 108 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 73GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 310 310 304 308 307 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 448 Mixed 394 SusWrite 325 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 54.7 182% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 201 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 232GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 276 277 276 276 276 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 295 Mixed 320 SusWrite 296 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 51.3 173% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 158 130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 118%
SABRENT 1TB 778GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT303.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1664 1008 1006 1008 1013 1006 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 184 186 196 194 195 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 111 Write 89.8 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 189 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 212 217 217 212 215 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 114 123 115 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 118 Write 125 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 117 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 2.4 470% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C16 4x8GB 1,159 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	100% Outstanding	MC Read 41 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 39.9 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 28.2 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 37.7 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	569x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16