Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 184 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 541 54% 442 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3FA2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 7 5% 5.87 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 1 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 34,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Legend(17AA 3FA2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	42.3% Average	Lighting 52.7 Reflection 53.2 Parallax 49.7 43% 51.9 fps	MRender 62.6 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 43.3 41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256 256GB 2,132 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1S262 SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 316 265 202 192 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 555 Write 735 Mixed 488 SusWrite 242 114% 505 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 17.5 68% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 592 DQ Write 624 DQ Mixed 381 349% 533 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 159%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 29GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 66.7 Write 24.6 Mixed 44 SusWrite 13.6 44% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.5 146% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart Brazil SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 1x8GB 468 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 10.5 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 8 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	458x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	217x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	423x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	252x

SSD
CL1-4D256 256GBSsstcBench 118%, 2,132 samples	211x
SSDPEKNW512G8L 512GBIntelBench 147%, 8,016 samples	96x
IM2P33F4 256GBNvmeBench 136%, 233 samples	84x

RAM
Brazil SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 1x8GBSmartBench 45%, 468 samples	324x
Brazil SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 2x8GBSmartBench 83%, 77 samples	66x
Brazil SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 16GBSmartBench 81%, 25 samples	21x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16