Ncstech FOUR4-MT-A402

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Ncstech FOUR4-MT-A402 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8H61-M LE/CSM
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '17 at 05:16
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 202 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 488 56% 435 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 33 Parallax 36.8 25% 33.5 fps	MRender 28.9 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 38.6 26% 30.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 4929871 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -97925254317574 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 414 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 289 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 82 47250014235 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4929871 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4929871 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4929871 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13457 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8993 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8993 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23277	31.6% Below average	Read 201 Write 107 Mixed 121 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 7.91 54% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.5 DQ Write 46.1 DQ Mixed 32.4 25% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 83%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB 3,103 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 298GB free Firmware: 21.00M21 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 183 5550 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6622 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29535 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5993 (BE) vendor-specific 60 46 40 (C2) HDA temperature 110 96 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.5% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 64.1 Mixed 61.1 47% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.39 111% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 36%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 298GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 134 132 4291 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3809 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12686 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3317 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 141 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3809 (C2) HDA temperature 106 91 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.5% Good	Read 108 Write 103 Mixed 95.2 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.43 105% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 2x4GB 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.5 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FOUR4-MT-A402 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Ncstech FOUR4-MT-A402

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	13x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	10x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x

SSD
SU635 240GBAdata $20Bench 68%, 12,702 samples	3x
WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TBWDCBench 98%, 8,872 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
PSD38G16002 2x8GBPatriotBench 52%, 6,044 samples	4x
99U5471-025.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 774 samples	3x
Vulcan-1600 2x4GBTeamBench 49%, 618 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16