Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 223%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 00:30
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 92%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 209
2-Core 330
118% 210 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,208
110% 896 Pts
64-Core 2,507
168% 2,507 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$750
Nvidia(10DE 1539) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 218
Parallax 258
200% 241 fps
MRender 281
Gravity 214
Splatting 161
180% 218 fps
Poor: 175%
This bench: 191%
Great: 227%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2007 674 673 676 671 672 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,573
Write 2,400
Mixed 1,701
SusWrite 896
423% 1,892 MB/s
4K Read 76.4
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 110
390% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 1,875
DQ Write 1,708
DQ Mixed 1,807
1,351% 1,797 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 358%
Great: 337%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
141GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 295 283 286 283 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 486
Mixed 420
SusWrite 309
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 65.7
225% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
224GB free
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 808 577 231 231 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 931
Write 691
Mixed 764
SusWrite 479
160% 716 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 46.5
215% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 422
329% 461 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 152%
Great: 145%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
846GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 162 165 165 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 103
Write 128
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 168
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 38.9
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 31.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 110 6 240 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical Z690 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3050 $292Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378Nvidia RTX 3070 $536Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback