Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 126% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171003
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '17 at 18:44
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 69.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 78% 145 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 965 86% 725 Pts	64-Core 2,586 160% 2,586 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 211 Parallax 183 123% 182 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 184 Splatting 132 123% 152 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 98GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5484 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 726 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 21 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21895388109	100% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 401 Mixed 410 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 39.3 156% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 77.4 88% 150 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 986 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 108 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 54 29 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 64 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13015462895	97.6% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 402 Mixed 410 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 38.8 150% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 72.9 78% 131 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 131%
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 240GB-$110 2,356 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 18GB free Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7090 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 398 (AB) Unknown 100 100 82934608 (AE) Unknown 100 100 54 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 11 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1096 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3885 (F9) Unknown 100 100 45761411	78.5% Very good	Read 509 Write 348 Mixed 400 93% 419 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 23.2 100% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 62.4 DQ Mixed 56.7 66% 118 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 108%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3GB free Firmware: CXM01B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9899 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 893 (B1) Unknown 99 99 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 54 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 310 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1179564197	57.8% Above average	Read 486 Write 159 Mixed 200 61% 282 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 15.3 73% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 56.9 DQ Mixed 40.7 59% 117 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 374GB free Firmware: MN6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 83 (03) Spinup time 191 191 21492728135 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5313 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 130 130 28 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14835 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 939 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5333 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5333 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 201864314919 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.9% Above average	Read 99.6 Write 98.8 Mixed 81.5 70% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 85%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 37GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 3738 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1489 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5187 (0A) Spinup retry count 129 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 136 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 29 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 68 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1695 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 257699348520 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1321 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 539 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	58.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 96.7 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.26 98% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 109%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 16GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 139 10741 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1340 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3756 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 70 (10) Unknown 0 200 7914179865 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 48 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1292 (C2) HDA temperature 106 97 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53% Above average	Read 93.3 Write 90.6 Mixed 95.4 70% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 3.01 4K Mixed 0.29 127% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 2,982 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	MC Read 63.5 MC Write 63 MC Mixed 61.1 179% 62.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 23.3 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16