Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateMay 29 '22 at 13:28
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 272
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 926
86% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,444
89% 1,444 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 39.2
36% 41.6 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 27.8
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,544
Write 2,090
Mixed 1,584
460% 2,073 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 92.6
317% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 1,211
DQ Mixed 1,154
858% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
3TB free
Firmware: LEGNT3D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 154 161 155 156 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 198
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 154
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
286% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 102%
Great: 136%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
886GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 51.7
Write 55.5
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 69.8
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
834GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 69 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 77
SusWrite 68.1
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
802GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 118 116 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 120
Write 105
Mixed 80
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB
146GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 36.9
Write 38.3
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 38.9
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZKW 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.2
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.8
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback