Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 16:20
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 154
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 456
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0448) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1420 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 59.7
39% 44.8 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 24.6
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 119 120 118 115 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 399
Write 122
Mixed 181
SusWrite 119
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 35.1
125% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 136
104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow KC300 180GB-$122
41GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 149 146 147 146 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 292
Write 260
Mixed 225
SusWrite 150
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 32.8
112% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 139
125% 189 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
141GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 70 71 83 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 82.7
Write 85
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 83.1
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 13.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback