Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 228%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 23:07
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 178
2-Core 348
111% 207 Pts
4-Core 691
8-Core 1,324
120% 1,007 Pts
64-Core 3,152
195% 3,152 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Gigabyte(1458 40A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 4988 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 288
Parallax 310
246% 300 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 256
Splatting 199
217% 276 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 209%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 1314 1135 1064 1038 1014 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,684
Write 2,600
Mixed 1,947
SusWrite 1,212
473% 2,111 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 97.7
329% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,384
DQ Write 1,101
DQ Mixed 1,206
912% 1,230 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 339%
Great: 435%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
831GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1308 1310 1312 1150 1072 378 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,519
Write 1,392
Mixed 1,055
SusWrite 1,088
284% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 82.1
282% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 567
516% 787 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 254%
Great: 282%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 126 127 125 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 86.6
Write 94.5
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 122
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 114 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 45.7
Write 63.8
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 110
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 90%
Asmt 2105 3TB
403GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 120 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 59.5
Write 112
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 121
60% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
108% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 103%
H/W RAID 10 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 29
Mixed 26
SusWrite 39.4
44% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 124 123 124 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 113
Mixed 89
SusWrite 122
147% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
221% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 152 152 151 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 156
Write 164
Mixed 105
SusWrite 150
194% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
4TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 156 156 156 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 160
Write 170
Mixed 118
SusWrite 158
206% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.5
251% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 43.7
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 32.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 42.9
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback