Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5600U 20,423 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 78 2-Core 140 56% 95 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 252 31% 235 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 062C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 5.9 3% 4.37 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 6.3 5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 18 8.5 13 14 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.1 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	885x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	35x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	29x

SSD
LCH-256V2S-11 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonBench 79%, 1,558 samples	34x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	141x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	67x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	45x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16