Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '17 at 20:50
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 211 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 708 65% 542 Pts	64-Core 1,322 82% 1,322 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 112 Parallax 98.8 91% 108 fps	MRender 97.5 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 227GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6618 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3192 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 56 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 859 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15285805702	79.7% Very good	Read 501 Write 227 Mixed 356 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 20.8 123% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 20.7 71% 157 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 118%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 197GB free Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3373 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1995 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 294 (C2) HDA temperature 73 58 180389609499	45.5% Average	Read 493 Write 63.2 Mixed 220 56% 259 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 6.82 65% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 31 39% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 83%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 143GB free Firmware: SAFC12.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1416 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 672 (A2) Unknown 100 100 132 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 131088 (AE) Unknown 100 100 124 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 124 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 1 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1044 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1514	75.8% Very good	Read 512 Write 356 Mixed 352 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 10.3 85% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 9.28 62% 145 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	241% Outstanding	Read 2,653 Write 1,251 Mixed 1,386 387% 1,763 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 25.8 189% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 57.4 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 30.7 44% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 241% Great: 236%
WD WD50PURX-64LZMY0 5TB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 192 9183 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1669 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1934 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1023 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 168 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1500 (C2) HDA temperature 126 104 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1486 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	98.9% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 164 Mixed 146 123% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.22 86% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 137 137 21493514508 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1823 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2037 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1113 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1838 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1838 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 201864577052 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 176 Mixed 166 133% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.18 92% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 778GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 65 (03) Spinup time 133 133 25787498794 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6116 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6663 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3205 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 12237 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 12237 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 206159544348 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88.9% Excellent	Read 150 Write 160 Mixed 128 109% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.22 78% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 2,740 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.8% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 24.6 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 23.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)