Asus X99-S

Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-S (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 94.5 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 214 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 758 74% 605 Pts	64-Core 975 60% 975 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% MSI(1462 3903); GeForce RTX™ 3060 Ti GAMING Z TRIO CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Lighting 197 Reflection 180 Parallax 172 161% 183 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 139 Splatting 120 119% 150 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 467 Write 448 Mixed 374 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 55 184% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 346 262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Corsair Force 40GB-$94 346 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1GB free Firmware: 1.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 133 Write 57.3 Mixed 75.8 20% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 21.7 94% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 46 DQ Mixed 70.2 55% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 44%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 147GB free Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1422 1182 939 667 680 631 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 857 Write 934 Mixed 612 SusWrite 920 187% 831 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 31.8 131% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 74.3 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 725 433% 439 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 298%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3264 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.9% Very good	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 26.5 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 19.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 58.4 68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	211x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	81x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	41x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	52x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	32x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	29x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GBCorsairBench 89%, 2,538 samples	15x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $774

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16