Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

24 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160309
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 23 '22 at 00:28
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 91.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 226 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 538 63% 489 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.04 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Lighting 43.6 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 40.3 36% 42.2 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 28.4 29% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 760GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 461 460 446 441 456 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 441 Mixed 424 SusWrite 454 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 59.5 206% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 351 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 137%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 102 103 101 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 110 Write 98 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 102 124% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 18.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	173x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	158x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	100x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	89x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	23x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16