To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 129
55% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 232
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
PowerColor(148C 2390) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 23.2
12% 21.3 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 23.3
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFGJ1.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 216
Write 180
Mixed 190
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 26.2
88% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 36.9
32% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 80%
Samsung HD161HJ 41R0186LEN 160GB
10GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 71 72 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 72.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 68
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
387GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 179 181 180 182 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 166
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 179
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
38GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 87 15 2.6 1.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 53.4
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-012.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback