Acer Predator G3620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator G3620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3620
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130430
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 17:31
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 205
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 505
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B 8304) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 18.5
11% 16.8 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 12.5
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 417 95 2.6 73 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 468
Write 417
Mixed 384
SusWrite 110
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 223 225 227 225 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 130%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 20.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 6.2
15% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.2 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 21.9
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 6.4
15% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
772GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 17.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 6.2
14% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0604
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 24.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 7.2
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
554GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.3 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 23
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 7.2
15% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11%
Great: 97%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
697GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.3 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 22.4
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 6.1
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
857GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 19.3
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 7.1
15% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 97%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 21.7
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 6.2
15% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
273% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
154GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 34.5
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 36.3
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
549GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 21.9
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 6.9
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12%
Great: 22%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.8 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 22.8
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 5.6
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston 9905584-027.A00LF Kingston 9905584-027.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3620 Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $521
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback