| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120530 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 21 '22 at 16:33 |
| Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.5%
Good
|
60% 98.7 Pts
|
37% 304 Pts
|
22% 361 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1564 MHz, MLim: 1760 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.59
|
36.1%
Below average
|
38% 45.9 fps
|
32% 39.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
476GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 346 365 345 350 350 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
78% 348 MB/s
|
140% 47.2 MB/s
|
43% 59.8 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
626GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 361 383 376 375 376 MB/s
|
90.1%
Outstanding
|
84% 375 MB/s
|
156% 51.9 MB/s
|
48% 65.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.4%
Average
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
52% 76.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-970A-UD3 Builds (Compare 501 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 109x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 62x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 46x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |