Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 14:38
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,074
100% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,572
106% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72% Very good
Lighting 92.8
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 85.4
75% 90 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 73.1
68% 88 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72%
Great: 75%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$134
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2846 2506 1753 1784 1736 1499 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,774
Write 3,238
Mixed 2,966
SusWrite 2,021
621% 2,750 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 96.6
284% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,183
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 1,031
778% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 290%
This bench: 371%
Great: 483%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 398 399 400 401 399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2601
Write 2,244
Mixed 1,620
SusWrite 581
392% 1,761 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 89.6
307% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 892
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 982
688% 867 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 271%
Great: 296%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 31 38 79 66 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 52%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 134GB
125GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 13
10% 8.98 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$57
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.4% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 25.2
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 26: 2R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 18% 65 313 243 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
History: Score 21: 2R 2G 5B | Score 26: 2R 3G 7B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 97,678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,164
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $280Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $111
Intel Core i7-12700K $380Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback