Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 00:11
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 277
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 841
82% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
EVGA(3842 4877) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
201% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 258
Parallax 287
239% 279 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 240
Splatting 179
201% 256 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 201%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,021
Write 2,277
Mixed 1,773
453% 2,024 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 75.1
260% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 1,096
832% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 315 315 315 316 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 480
Mixed 413
SusWrite 330
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 63.8
217% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 365
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
339GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 420 285 287 286 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 377
Mixed 430
SusWrite 340
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 48.1
168% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 364
274% 365 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$246
1.5TB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2457 2468 2459 2501 2474 2409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 2,669
Write 2,471
Mixed 1,782
SusWrite 2,461
528% 2,346 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 68.1
217% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1179
901% 1,223 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 380%
Great: 389%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
6GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 92 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 78.7
Write 88.1
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 89.4
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 83 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 84
Write 83.8
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 84.8
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 32.1
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 34.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $684
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback