Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '22 at 20:43
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 230
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 69.6
8-Core 503
28% 286 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.9
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 63.5
53% 66.3 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 55.5
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 959 980 967 962 983 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,795
Write 2,157
Mixed 2,070
SusWrite 1,021
397% 1,761 MB/s
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 617
572% 598 MB/s
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 64.5
215% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
228GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 317 317 317 317 317 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 338
Write 443
Mixed 380
SusWrite 332
84% 373 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 168
110% 123 MB/s
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 34.2
128% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 169 170 169 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 119
Write 186
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 169
89% 123 MB/s
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
128% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
626GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 109 107 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 73.7
Write 79.6
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 106
52% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 42.7
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 28
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $934
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback