Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 61.7 2-Core 126 56% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 306 32% 258 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 809F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 7.4 Parallax 8.9 6% 7.9 fps	MRender 7.4 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 8.2 7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Bory R500 240G 240GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200326 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 211 104 9.5 208 172 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37% Below average	Read 243 Write 9.2 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 149 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 8.4 45% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 97.7 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 15.8 39% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MXIC 25L8005 1x33GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 7 slots used 33GB FLASH 33 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.8 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	87x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16