Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220427
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 18 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 85.1 1-Core 145 2-Core 281 93% 170 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 872 85% 700 Pts	64-Core 1,097 68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)	54.7% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 63.9 55% 66.8 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 69 Splatting 63.6 54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB 10,941 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFA12.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 466 566 522 569 544 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 638 Write 1,558 Mixed 686 SusWrite 568 196% 863 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 63.8 223% 85.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,326 DQ Write 1,098 DQ Mixed 1,187 896% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 240%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 29GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 22.6 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 18.4 28% 23 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.5 144% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 35.4 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 35 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,302x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	615x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	583x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	466x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	381x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	355x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	186x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	151x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	144x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	152x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	116x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $689

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16