Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

24 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V12.1
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 89.9 1-Core 128 2-Core 239 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 702 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 699 43% 699 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 7507) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Lighting 94 Reflection 122 Parallax 94.4 77% 103 fps	MRender 93.6 Gravity 93.5 Splatting 102 80% 96.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 804 613 614 612 604 605 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 1,765 Write 1,324 Mixed 751 SusWrite 642 249% 1,120 MB/s	4K Read 57.3 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 73.3 257% 91.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,221 DQ Write 908 DQ Mixed 973 752% 1034 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 259%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 216GB free Firmware: CXY7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 642 642 640 639 639 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,022 Write 843 Mixed 684 SusWrite 666 180% 804 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 74.9 262% 93.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,280 DQ Write 1,027 DQ Mixed 1,059 818% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GB 2,421 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 28.3 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 37.4 SC Mixed 26.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V12.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	14x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	15x
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	2x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $119Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	9x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	4x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	1x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 3,102 samples	7x
F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 82%, 2,421 samples	4x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 79%, 111 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $349

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16