Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemToshiba QOSMIO X70-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 17:09
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 44.8
28% 40.3 Pts
4-Core 81
8-Core 121
12% 101 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Toshiba(1179 FA77) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1935
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 44.4
Reflection 53
Parallax 39.4
36% 45.6 fps
MRender 48.4
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 31.4
31% 39 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS480G 480GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 213 187 174 152 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 350
Write 264
Mixed 247
SusWrite 189
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 3.7
37% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 128
101% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
887GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 256 309 318 337 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 374
Write 313
Mixed 301
SusWrite 308
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 19.6
62% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 144
111% 153 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 2133 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 2000 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 4.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.5
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QOSMIO X70-A Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback