Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 42.9 1-Core 55.6 2-Core 95.1 38% 64.5 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 156 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 8444) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0 0% 0.57 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 4 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB 14,590 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT24H3Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 359 Write 310 Mixed 315 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 18.5 58% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 153 139% 212 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S 1x4GB 928 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.4 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	1,599x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	365x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	123x

SSD
MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 4,927 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 76%, 2,721 samples	42x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	239x
AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S 1x4GBAdataBench 22%, 928 samples	174x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	167x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16