Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	13.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics 1,618 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Memory 27.7 1-Core 17.8 2-Core 38.4 18% 28 Pts	4-Core 16.8 8-Core 12.6 2% 14.7 Pts	64-Core 11.2 1% 11.2 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 30%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: P181106a SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 118 135 98 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.4% Very poor	Read 85.5 Write 93.5 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 103 20% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 5.4 11% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 99%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 8.4 6.6 8.4 6.6 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	3.97% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 0.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 7.5 8% 6.88 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 4 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.9 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 268 15% 268 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 22%, 1,618 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	2x

SSD
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16