To Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	To Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '22 at 02:11
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 176 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 527 52% 426 Pts	64-Core 641 40% 641 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 42.2 Parallax 46.9 28% 41.3 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 27.8 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 6,980 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 122GB free Firmware: FW200929 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 256 241 232 231 223 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.8% Below average	Read 260 Write 203 Mixed 176 SusWrite 240 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 6.9 39% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 39.8 DQ Mixed 9.6 13% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 377GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.4 6.8 13 15 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.94% Terrible	Read 14 Write 14.7 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 10.2 11% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 6.94% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.6% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	504x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	215x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	95x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	47x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	41x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16