Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211105
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	May 16 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 89.4 1-Core 130 2-Core 261 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 792 76% 630 Pts	64-Core 963 60% 963 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8625) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.09 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	48.5% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 59.5 Parallax 59.7 48% 59.5 fps	MRender 59.8 Gravity 59.8 Splatting 59.8 49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 125 127 121 124 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 460 Write 157 Mixed 196 SusWrite 128 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 31.2 125% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 216 170% 242 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 129%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB 10,890 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 111GB free Firmware: 1L2QEXD7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 502 310 310 311 307 311 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 2,102 Write 1,281 Mixed 1,120 SusWrite 342 268% 1,212 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 69.4 229% 77.5 MB/s	DQ Read 968 DQ Write 664 DQ Mixed 829 615% 820 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 247%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 133GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 116 115 115 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 109 Write 112 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 116 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.8% Good	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 18.5 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,317x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,137x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,085x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,046x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	812x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	685x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	510x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	508x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	466x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $796

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16