Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive373% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 02:27
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$500
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 989
90% 735 Pts
64-Core 2,316
155% 2,316 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$420
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 114
Parallax 130
103% 124 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 114
Splatting 108
101% 136 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$160
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2231 2245 1938 1941 1959 1955 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
373% Outstanding
Read 2,746
Write 3140
Mixed 2,977
SusWrite 2,045
616% 2,727 MB/s
4K Read 80.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 102
330% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 719
556% 769 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 373%
Great: 481%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$135
82GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,477
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,596
478% 2,151 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 88.5
284% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 976
725% 970 MB/s
Poor: 218% Great: 374%
WD WD80EFBX-68AZZN0 8TB
870GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 124 123 125 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 114
Write 125
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 126
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.3
337% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 118%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$146
3TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 164 167 170 167 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 178
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 168
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
334% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
337GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 77 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 82
Mixed 77
SusWrite 78.6
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 172 176 176 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 100
Write 110
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 172
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
229% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
823GB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 71 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 79.6
Write 71.4
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 72.7
93% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
235% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 65%
USB3.1 NVME&SATA 500GB
435GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 38.8
Write 39.6
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 39.6
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 17.5
1,292% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 17.9
1,328% 18 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 88%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB
2.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 154 148 150 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 160
Write 167
Mixed 190
SusWrite 151
231% 167 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1.7
358% 6.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 102%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
96GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 70.4
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 70.5
92% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 60%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
2TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 126 127 131 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 156
SusWrite 129
188% 135 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.7
309% 6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$230
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 37.1
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 33.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 75 33.1" 1280 720 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 17,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 207%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback