Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
13 days ago, 8 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 02:12
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$210
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 269
94% 165 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 762
82% 639 Pts
64-Core 769
52% 769 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 95.6
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 80.1
77% 88.8 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 82.4
Splatting 74.2
64% 73.9 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X210 512GB-$152
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X210706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 394 377 379 386 391 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 366
Mixed 237
SusWrite 385
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 36.3
142% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 130
135% 222 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 101%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 63.1
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 106
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
53GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 35.7
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 39.1
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 Adata AO2P26KC8T1-BPYS 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 23
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 20: 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 11% 57 110 7 60 24" 1920 1080 GSM5B73 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $468
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback