Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	370% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210809
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 15 '22 at 02:09
Run Duration	359 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$500 293,369 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 79.8 1-Core 129 2-Core 259 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 517 8-Core 949 91% 733 Pts	64-Core 2,297 154% 2,297 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$420 276,725 User benchmarks, average bench 99% EVGA(3842 3062) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 114 Parallax 130 103% 124 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 115 Splatting 106 101% 135 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$160 125,808 User benchmarks, average bench 402% 582GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2215 2089 1950 1954 1965 1969 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	370% Outstanding	Read 2,816 Write 3214 Mixed 3,000 SusWrite 2,024 624% 2,763 MB/s	4K Read 78.3 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 98 319% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1015 DQ Write 522 DQ Mixed 771 572% 769 MB/s
Poor: 277% ↑ This bench: 370% Great: 481%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$135 314,224 User benchmarks, average bench 300% 82GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 2,544 Write 2,379 Mixed 1,704 491% 2,209 MB/s	4K Read 65.1 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 88.1 294% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,124 DQ Write 760 DQ Mixed 944 704% 943 MB/s
Poor: 218% Great: 374%
WD WD80EFBX-68AZZN0 8TB 375 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 870GB free Firmware: 85.00A85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 124 123 126 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 115 Write 125 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 126 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.4 371% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 118%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$146 12,298 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 164 167 170 167 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 178 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 168 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 350% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB 9,314 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 337GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 77 78 79 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 59.2 Write 81.9 Mixed 76 SusWrite 78.7 55% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,710 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4.5TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 170 173 170 169 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 109 Write 166 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 170 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.8 217% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 86%
WD easystore 2624 5TB 2,152 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 823GB free, PID 2624 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 81.6 Write 66.4 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 73 92% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 0.6 292% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 65%
USB3.1 NVME&SATA 500GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 435GB free, PID 9210 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 39.8 Write 40.5 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 40.4 55% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 21.9 1,666% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.7 DQ Write 28.8 DQ Mixed 22.3 1,815% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 88%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB 1,283 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 153 149 150 146 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 160 Write 168 Mixed 199 SusWrite 151 235% 169 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 1.4 395% 7.43 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 8.5 DQ Mixed 2.2 368% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 102%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,184 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 96GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 71 72 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 68.4 Write 68.3 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 70.7 92% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 60%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,231 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 126 127 131 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 125 Write 129 Mixed 148 SusWrite 129 184% 133 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 1.5 386% 7.13 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 7.9 DQ Mixed 1.9 337% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$230 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 41 MC Write 36.4 MC Mixed 37.8 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 35.6 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 17,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 177%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 207%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $500Bench 86%, 293,369 samples	3,489x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $315Bench 85%, 755,235 samples	2,892x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $389Bench 102%, 132,057 samples	2,275x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 208%, 303,512 samples	1,545x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 578,095 samples	1,459x
RX 5700-XTAMD $410Bench 105%, 378,316 samples	1,076x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $114Bench 331%, 398,388 samples	1,347x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $70Bench 292%, 404,348 samples	1,060x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $160Bench 402%, 125,808 samples	952x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 63,717 samples	862x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $83Bench 84%, 341,100 samples	564x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $286Bench 88%, 128,222 samples	512x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,314

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350	Nvidia RTX 3050 $250	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16