| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200610 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 15 '22 at 01:00 |
| Run Duration | 282 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.4%
Above average
|
60% 100 Pts
|
23% 194 Pts
|
16% 254 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
|
58.5%
Above average
|
51% 88.2 fps
|
72% 90.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 76 39 109 81 64 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
25% 110 MB/s
|
67% 25.2 MB/s
|
136% 187 MB/s
|
|
Intenso SSD 120GB
26GB free
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 410 96 42 41 53 MB/s
|
58.3%
Above average
|
62% 276 MB/s
|
76% 29.5 MB/s
|
92% 189 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905743-019.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
|
36.8%
Below average
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
21% 7.5 GB/s
|
47% 85.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,985 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 436x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 322x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 300x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 221x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 199x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 164x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $298 |